Tuesday 1 December 2015
TOUGH new policies to combat fish fraud across Europe appear to be working, according to new evidence (published today). The largest multi-species survey of fish labelling accuracy to date indicates a marked and sudden reduction of seafood mislabelling in supermarkets, markets and fishmongers in the EU.
TOUGH new policies to combat fish fraud across Europe appear to be working, according to new evidence (published today).
The largest multi-species survey of fish labelling accuracy to date indicates a marked and sudden reduction of seafood mislabelling in supermarkets, markets and fishmongers in the EU.
Scientists in six European countries tracked samples of the mostly commonly consumed fish, including cod, tuna, hake and plaice, after a series of studies going back 5 years had shown mislabelling in up to 40% of cases.
It is thought that more transparent seafood supply chains can lead to more sustainable exploitation and healthier oceans. The study is part of the LABELFISH project, supported by the EU Atlantic Area Programme and the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
Principal Investigator Stefano Mariani, professor of conservation genetics at the University of Salford, said he was surprised at the progress made but that much remains to be investigated about the complexities of global seafood supply.
Mariani and his collaborators* carried out genetic testing of seafood sold in supermarkets, traditional markets and fishmongers in 19 European cities between 2013 and 2014, including Cardiff, Glasgow, Plymouth and Manchester, Dublin, Madrid, Marseille, Lisbon and Hamburg.
Species verification was carried out on fresh, frozen and tinned products labelled as cod, tuna, haddock, plaice, sole, swordfish, anchovy, hake and monkfish.
Of the 1,563 DNA sequence samples examined, just 77 (4.9%) proved to be mislabelled.
Most commonly mislabelled was anchovy (15.5%), hake (11.1%) and tuna (6.8%). By contrast only 3.5% of cod and 3% of haddock was mislabelled. None of the monkfish, plaice or swordfish samples was substituted with other species.
The study found little or no difference in tinned, fresh or frozen products and no significant country-associated trends.
According to the samples taken, Spain had the highest rate of incorrect labelling (8.9%), followed by Portugal (6.7%), Germany (6.2%), Ireland (3.9%), the UK (3.3%) and France (2.7%).
The study, which is published today in Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, argues that the trend is due to a combination of transnational legislation, governance and public outreach, which has forced new regulation and self-regulation, and it contrasts the European ‘turn-around’ with the experience of the United States, where improvements appear more sluggish.
Professor Mariani added: “Genetic identification methods have progressively exposed the inadequacies of the seafood supply chain, raising awareness among the public, and serving as a warning to industry that malpractice will be detected.
“This evidence indicates we are now on the road to greater transparency, which should help the management of exploited stocks worldwide, but further standardised studies on a greater range of food provision channels, such as restaurants and auctions, are warranted, in order to have a complete understanding of the current state of the trade”
The research was conducted by The University of Salford, The Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas, Vigo; The Max Rubner-Institute, Kiel; Ifremer, Nantes; The Portuguese Institute for the Sea and Atmosphere, Lisbon and The Indigo Rock Marine Research Station, Cork.
The full paper can be accessed at the following URL: doi:10.1890/150119, or by request to the Salford University Press Office.
For more information, please contact:
Professor Stefano Mariani, Chair in Conservation Genetics
t: +44 (0)161-295-6913 | m: +44 (0)7712-689-871 | email@example.com
0161 295 6895